Sanjeev Dadarao Bhosale v. The State Of Maharashtra

cp213-24.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.213 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6001 OF 2023 Sanjeev Dadaro Bhosale PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Annasaheb S. Kadam, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. V. K. Kotecha, AGP for Respondent - State .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 14 th OCTOBER, 2025 ORDER :

1.

By 昀椀ling a昀케davit in reply, the Respondents have contended that, decision is taken in the case of the petitioner. 2.

After perusing the a昀케davit, learned Advocate for the Petitioner con昀椀rms the said position.

3.

In view of compliance of the direction, the Contempt Petition is disposed of.

4.

It is informed at the Bar that, earlier, Petitioner No.2 had refused to accept the cheque issued in his name and a request is made to allow Petitioner No.2 to accept the amount. Petitioner No.2 is permitted to accept the cheque amount. [ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/cp213-24.doc