The State Of Maharashtra And ORS v. Popat Govind Jagtap

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3457 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 4955 OF 2019 The State of Maharashtra & others Applicants

Versus

Popat Govind Jagtap Respondent Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for the Applicants None present for the Respondent.

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 13th February, 2023.

PC :

Heard learned AGP for the applicants. The learned Counsel for respondent- claimant, despite appearance, remained absent.

The applicant-State-acquiring body is seeking condonation of delay of 1785 days, which appears to be caused due to obtaining approvals at various stages. Hence, by considering the statutory right of the applicant, delay of 1785 days stands condoned. Appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce

{2} objections, if any.

Civil Application is disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb

{3}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3459 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 4955 OF 2019 The State of Maharashtra & others Applicants

Versus

Popat Govind Jagtap Respondent Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for the Applicants None present for the Respondent.

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 13th February, 2023.

PC :

Heard learned AGP for the applicant-acquiring body. The learned Counsel for respondent- claimant, despite appearance, remained absent.

There shall be stay to the execution of the impugned judgment and award in terms of prayer clause {B} subject to the condition that the State-acquiring body shall deposit entire amount of the impugned award along with the interest within twelve weeks.

Civil Application is disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb