Vinay Gendmal Banthiya v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

1 wp 1832.07

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1832 OF 2007 Vijany S/o Gendmal Banthiya .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri A. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. M. Ganachari, A.G.P. for the Respondent No. 1. Shri S. T. Shelke, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 06TH JUNE, 2016.

PER COURT :

.

Heard Mr. Deshmukh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shelke, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and the learned A. G. P. for the respondent/State. 2.

With the passage of time the relief claimed in the writ petition does not survive. In the light of that, the writ petition is disposed of. Rule discharged.

[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/June 16