Mr Zunzar Sampatrao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 20-wp-6222-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6222 OF 2019 Zunzar Sampatrao Patil ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents ....

Mr. P. D. Bachate, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 5 - State. ....

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ DATED : 06 th JUNE, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

The petitioner has approached the Commissioner of Sugar for difference of payment of amount.

2.

We have also heard the learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 5.

3.

The learned AGP submits that if the representation of the petitioner is pending, the Commissioner of Sugar may take decision upon it in accordance with law.

4.

In case, the petitioner has approached the Commissioner of Sugar for payment of difference of F.R.P. (Exhibit - "H"), then the Commissioner of Sugar shall take decision on the same on its own

2 20-wp-6222-19.doc merits after hearing all the parties concerned, expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from today. 5.

The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(MANGESH S. PATIL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE SMS