← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3278/2014disposed offdismissed for default

Kanta Tulshiram Potdar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2017-12-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh2 pages

1 WP - 3278-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3278 OF 2014 KANTA TULSHIRAM POTDAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Paresh B. Patil AGP for Respondent : Mrs. S.S. Raut Advocate for Respondents 4 and 5 : Mr. H.B. Nandgavale h/f Mr. V.G. Sakolkar ...

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 14-12-2017 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Learned counsel for respondents no. 4 and 5 contends that plaintiff challenges cancellation of mutation entry directly in the high court by-passing the remedies, as may be available alternatively.

3.

Learned counsel for petitioner though purports to dispute, having regard to that challenge is to cancellation of mutation entry, it would be open for the petitioner, to take recourse to possible alternate remedy.

2 WP - 3278-2014 4.

In the circumstances, writ petition is not being entertained and is disposed of.

[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE arp/