Dattatraya Raosaheb Patil (Salunke) v. Savita Dattatraya Patil (Salunke) And Others

1 Sr25CA11043.2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11043 OF 2018 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 5163 OF 2018 Dattatraya Raosaheb Patil (Salunke) ... Applicant

VERSUS

Savita Dattatraya Patil (Salunke) ... Respondent ..........

Mr Ganesh J. Kore, Advocate for the applicant .............

CORAM : A. M. DHAVALE, J.

DATE : 26TH NOVEMBER, 2018.

PER COURT :- .

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that, respondent No. 2 was appellant's father and he has expired. Respondent No. 1 is served with notice but she has not filed reply. There is delay of only one day in filing the present application. The delay caused in filing the instant application is only on account of poverty and difficulty in raising money. Considering the short delay, the delay is condoned. The registry to take up the matter for scrutiny and numbering. 2.

Civil Application stands disposed of.

[ A. M. DHAVALE ] JUDGE Punde