Sudam S/O Vitthal Ikalje v. 1 Railway Protection Force Thr. Inspector,Aurangabad And ORS

1 Cri.Al.362.00

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 362 OF 2000 The State of Maharashtra ...

APPELLANT

VERSUS

Balaji s/o Manikrao Jadhav & ors.

...

RESPONDENTS .....

Shri D.V. Tele, A.P.P. for appellant / State Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr. S.A.G. Qureshi, Advocate for Respondents No. 2 and 7 Mr. R.R. Imale, Advocate for respondent No. 3. Mr. Kalyan E. Shinde, Advocate for respondent No. 5. ...

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 887 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 362 OF 2000 Sudam S/o Vitthal Nikalje ...

APPLICANT

VERSUS

Railway Protection Force Through Inspector and ors ...

RESPONDENTS ....

Mr. R.R. Imale, Advocate for applicant Mr. D.V. Tele, A.P.P. For respondent No. 1 Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for respondent No. 2 Mr. S.A.G. Qureshi, Advocate for Respondents No. 3 and 7 Mr. Kalyan E. Shinde, Advocate for respondent No. 5. ....

CORAM : A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATED : 5th MARCH, 2015

2 Cri.Al.362.00 Order :- 1.

Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that fresh address of respondent no. 3 is as indicated in the Criminal Application No. 887 of 2015.

2.

Heard A.P.P. and learned counsel for applicantrespondent No. 3 in Criminal Application No. 887 of 2015. Bailable warrant issued against respondent No. 3 is cancelled. A.P.P. to correct address in Appeal Memo. 4.

Learned counsel for respondent No. 4 is not present. Bailable warrant of respondent No. 4 is returned back as he is not residing on the given address.

5.

Reissue bailable warrant to respondent No. 4 through trial Court, returnable on 06-04-2015.

6. P.I. concerned to take efforts to search out address of respondent No. 4 to serve bailable warrant.

7.

Criminal Application No. 887 of 2015 is disposed of. ( A.I.S. CHEEMA, J. ) MTK