Bombay High CourtCA/2980/2015admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute
Kalyani Rajendra Baviskar v. Rajendra Hiraman Baviskar
2015-03-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre1 pages
{1} 903 sr. no..odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2980 OF 2015 IN WP/391/2014 KALYANI RAJENDRA BAVISKAR
VERSUS
RAJENDRA HIRAMAN BAVISKAR ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.P. Latange Advocate for respondent : Mr. R.B. Ade with Mr. B.A. Rathod CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 17TH MARCH, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Heard.
2] Civil application is opposed by the petitioner husband on the ground that the main proceedings are still pending. 3] Having regard to the fact that the amount ordered to be deposited before this Court is towards part maintainance, Civil application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). [N.W. SAMBRE] JUDGE.
grt/-