← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/3406/2021disposed off

Rajabhau Ashruba Sapte And ORS v. Ex. Engineer, Beed Irrigation Division, Beed Under Gmidc, Aurangabad And ANR

2021-03-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3403 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.909 OF 2020 MAHADEV RAMKISAN SAPTE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BEED IRRIGATION DIVISION, BEED UNDER UNDER GMIDC, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3404 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.910 OF 2020 SUKHDEO TUKARAM KADAM AND OTHERS

VERSUS

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BEED IRRIGATION DIVISION, BEED UNDER UNDER GMIDC, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3405 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.911 OF 2020 BABASAHEB S/O ASHRUBA KADAM AND OTHERS

VERSUS

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BEED IRRIGATION DIVISION, BEED UNDER UNDER GMIDC, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3406 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.915 OF 2020 RAJABHAU S/O ASHRUBA SAPTE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BEED IRRIGATION DIVISION, BEED UNDER UNDER GMIDC, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3402 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.916 OF 2020 SUDHAKAR S/O AABARAO KHANDEKAR AND OTHERS

VERSUS

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BEED IRRIGATION DIVISION, BEED UNDER UNDER GMIDC, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER ...

Mr.T.G. Gaikwad Advocate for Applicants.

Mr.B.R. Survase Advocate for Resp. No.1.

Mr.S.S. Dande, AGP for Resp. No.2.

...

CORAM: ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATE : 31st MARCH, 2021 ORDER :

1.

These are the applications moved by the claimants for withdrawal of the amount.

2.

After hearing the appeals for some time, the appeals were admitted on the ground that the reference award which was the basis for grant of enhancement of compensation, in these matters, the said reference award has been challenged in the first appeal and the said first appeal is pending before this Court.

3.

In the circumstances, the learned counsel appearing for the claimants prays for permitting the claimants to withdraw 50% of the amount on furnishing undertaking.

4.

Shri Survase, learned counsel for acquiring body has no serious objection if the amount to the extent of 50% of the deposited amount is permitted to be withdrawn by the applicants.

5.

In that view of the matter, the applications are partly allowed. The applicants are permitted to withdraw 50% of the total amount deposited in this Court on furnishing undertaking to the effect that in the event, decision in First Appeal/s is adverse to their interest, they would pay back / re-deposit the amount being withdrawn under this order within a period of three months from the date of such decision. 6.

Civil applications are disposed of.

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] asb/MAR21