← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4524/2019disposed off

Ashruba Maroti Kadape v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2023-10-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

WP 4522/19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 WRIT PETITION NO.4522 OF 2019 ASHRUBA MAROTI KADAPE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. M.S. Karad h/f. Mr. S.S. Thombre AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr. K.B. Jadhavar ...

904 WRIT PETITION NO.4523 OF 2019 ASHRUBA MAROTI KADAPE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. M.S. Karad h/f. Mr. S.S. Thombre AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr. K.B. Jadhavar ...

905 WRIT PETITION NO.4524 OF 2019 ASHRUBA MAROTI KADAPE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. M.S. Karad h/f. Mr. S.S. Thombre AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr. K.B. Jadhavar ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATED : 26/10/2023 PER COURT :

1.

The learned counsel for the petitioners in above writ petitions seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to approach the revisional authority to challenge the impugned orders in these writ petitions.

2.

The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as above, if available in law.

3.

The learned counsel submits that status-quo may be granted for a

WP 4522/19 period of two weeks so as to enable the petitioners to approach the revisional authority.

4.

Status-quo be maintain for the period of two weeks from today to enable the petitioners to approach the statutory authority. However, it is clarified that the status-quo is not granted on merits of the matters and it is granted only to enable the petitioners to approach the statutory authority. The statutory authority to decide the revision petition and all interim applications, that may be filed therein, on it's own merits, without being influenced by the present status-quo order. 5.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the time spent in the present writ petitions be excluded in computing the period of limitation in approaching the revisional authority. 6.

The petitioners may apply to the concerned authority for exclusion of the time spent in this Court and the authority to decide the said issue in accordance with law.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER J.] ssc/