The Executive Engineer Upper Tapi Project Hatnoor Jalgaon v. Ashok Waman Patil And ORS
2025:BHC-AUG:17513 1 971-976(ii).CA-2424-2025.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2424 OF 2025 IN FAST/4329/2025 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER JALGAON MEDIUM PROJECT DIV JALGAON VS.
KRISHNA DEORAM MALI AND ORS .....
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajay Dongar Pawar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.A.Shinde ...
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2430 OF 2025 IN FAST/5153/2025 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER UPPER TAPI PROJECT HATNOOR JALGAON
VERSUS
MANIK MAHADU PATIL AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajay Dongar Pawar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.A.Shinde Advocate for Claimants : Mr. Datta A.Madke ...
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2432 OF 2025 IN FAST/5132/20254769 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER UPPER TAPI PROJECT HATNOOR JALGAON
VERSUS
INDUBAI PRABHAKAR PATIL AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajay Dongar Pawar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.A.Shinde Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Datta A.Madke ...
2 971-976(ii).CA-2424-2025.doc CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2434 OF 2025 IN FAST/5135/2025 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER UPPER TAPI PROJECT HATNOOR JALGAON
VERSUS
ASHOK WAMAN PATIL AND ORS .....
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajay Dongar Pawar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.A.Shinde Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Datta A.Madke ...
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2448 OF 2025 IN FAST/4769/2025 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER UPPER TAPI PROJECT HATNOOR JALGAON
VERSUS
SURESH WAMAN PATIL AND ORS .....
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajay Dongar Pawar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.A.Shinde Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Datta A.Madke ...
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2471 OF 2025 IN FAST/4779/2025 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER UPPER TAPI PROJECT HATNOOR JALGAON
VERSUS
KANHAIYALAL SONAJI PATIL DIED THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS SAKHUBAI AND ORS .....
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ajay Dongar Pawar AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.A.Shinde ...
3 971-976(ii).CA-2424-2025.doc CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 4th JULY 2025 PER COURT :
.
Applicant/Acquiring body seeks to condone delay caused in the appeal challenging judgment and award passed by the reference court. The contents of the applications in paragraph No.3 to 5 are pressed into service. Learned counsel for the claimants opposes the applications.
2.
Applicant/Acquiring body has deposited the amount under award. The contents of the applications are not controverted. 3.
For the reasons stated in the applications, it is desirable to allow the applications.
4.
Civil applications are allowed and delay caused in preferring appeals shall stand condoned.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] vsj..