Sakshi Sanjay Nannor v. Sunil Laxman Lokhande And Another
2025:BHC-AUG:4517 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 47 OF 2025 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.588 OF 2025 Sunil Laxman Lokhande, Age : 52 years, Occu. : Agriculture, R/o. Lokhande-vasti, Ranjagaon Sandas, Tq. Shirur, Dist. Pune.
... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Investigating Officer of Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar.
... Respondent ......
Mr. Narayan S. Pawar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for Respondent - State. Mr. N. B. Narwade, Advocate for Applicant in APPLN/588/2025 for Asstt.to PP (Informant) ......
CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.
RESERVED ON : 14 FEBRUARY, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 17 FEBRUARY, 2025 ORDER :
1.
Present application is for grant of regular bail on account of arrest of applicant in Crime No. 848 of 2021 registered at Rahuri Police Station, District Ahmednagar for offence punishable under sections 307, 450, 364, 342, 506, 195-A, 387 of Indian Penal Code and sections 3/25 and 5/27 of the Arms Act. 2.
Criminal Application No.588 of 2025 filed by informant
-2for intervention seeking permission to assist the public prosecutor is allowed.
3.
Learned counsel for applicant in bail application himself pointed out that, though in present application prayers are for grant of regular bail, present application is confined to temporary bail on medical ground. He submitted that, applicant is behind bars since 2021. He is suffering tinnitus decease. That, he is not getting proper medical treatment and even when he was taken to Government hospital, there was no relief and therefore he seeks directions to take applicant to private practitioner or private hospital.
4.
Learned APP opposed on the ground that medical aid as required is time and again provided. That, there is no need for referring him to private hospital. Learned APP pointed out that, serious crime is committed by using gun and firing at Police Officer, who himself has lodged report, and therefore, there being two crimes against present applicants, the same would be clubbed and dealt together. He pointed out that applicant is already a convict. He has also indulged in further crime and was on bail, however, he misused the liberty and has committed the above crime using fire arms and therefore, for all above reasons, learned APP opposes any relief.
-35.
As stated, on going through the bail application, there are prayers for quashing order below Exh.41 and 48 passed by learned Sessions Court, Ahmednagar and grant of regular bail. However, while arguing learned counsel confined the prayers for grant of temporary bail on medical grounds. On court query, about medical ailment, he reported that applicant suffers from tinnitus and hearing loss and that he has developed suicidal tendencies. Learned APP has already made a statement that, medical care is already provided and he was also referred to Government hospital. In spite of so, here it seems that, now prayers are for permission to be treated at private hospital. However, considering the nature of ailment as reflected above, this court is not inclined to grant temporary bail as no serious medical condition exist so as to consider the relief of temporary bail.
6.
The bail application stands rejected.
7.
Criminal Application No.588 of 2025 is also disposed off.
(ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.) Tandale