Liladhar Tukaram Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
{1} 9 sr. no..odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2928 OF 2013 LILADHAR TUKARAM PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vijay B. Patil. AGP for Respondents : Mr. A. M. Phule.
. . .
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 21ST JANUARY, 2016.
PER COURT:
1] Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to the filing of the present writ petition the respondents have issued notification under Section 4 and declaration under Sections 6 and 9. 2] In view of that, the grievance of the petitioner though belatedly stands redressed.
3] Further process shall be completed by the respondent authorities expeditiously.
4] Mr. Phule, AGP, on instructions submits that, award would be passed within the period of 1 month. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE Tandale/-