Mukesh Pandurang Pathak v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

940-Cri.Appln.752-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 752 OF 2024 MUKESH PANDURANG PATHAK

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sagar P. Mahale h/f Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar.

APP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. S. B. Narwade. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Ms. Nayana Patil (Appointed). ...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE :

12.07.2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the respective learned counsels.

2.

There was 24 days delay in preferring the present revision application.

3.

Learned counsel for the non-applicant strongly opposed the application. The reasons for the delay are not genuine. Hence, application may be rejected.

4.

Perused the application. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay deserves to be condoned. Hence, the application stands allowed.

940-Cri.Appln.752-24.odt 5.

The delay caused in preferring the revision application stands condoned.

6.

The Secretary, High Court Legal Services, SubCommittee, Aurangabad do pay the legal fees to learned counsel Ms. Patil, as per the schedule.

7.

Registry is directed to register the Criminal Revision Application.

8.

Learned APP waives service of notice for respondentState. Learned counsel Ms. Patil waives service of notice for respondent No.2.

9.

List the matter on 01.08.2024.

10.

Interim relief granted earlier to continue till next date. (S. G. MEHARE, J.) ...

vmk/-