The M.I.D.C. Thr. Its Area Manager, Ahmednagar v. Dagadu Kondaji Dalvi And ANR

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 643 OF 2011 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2168 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2170 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2164 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2169 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2165 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2163 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2167 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2173 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 225 OF 2013 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2166 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2171 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2172 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2044 OF 2012 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 651 OF 2011 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 594 OF 2013 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 596 OF 2013 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 652 OF 2011 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 654 OF 2011 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 650 OF 2011 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2011 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 638 OF 2011 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 641 OF 2011 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 653 OF 2011 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 657 OF 2011 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2011 Mr. S. S. Dande, Mr. V. P. Latange, Mr. S. L. Bhapkar, advocate for the Appellants Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Respondent No.2.

Mr. B. N. Palve, Mr. S. S. Deshmukh, Mr. R. R. Karpe and Mr. N. V. Gaware, advocate for Respondents CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 07th February, 2023.

{2} PC :

The learned Counsel Mr. V. P. Latange appearing on behalf of the respondents-claimants represented by him in

(09) matters, out of this group, made a statement that the respondents, to whom he is representing, would not claim any enhanced compensation. He further pointed out that all these matters are within four times and, therefore, can be disposed of as per GR of November 2017.

The learned Counsel Mr. Dande for acquiring body seeks time for taking instructions.

Stand over to 21.02.2023.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb

{3}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2226 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2168 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2213 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2170 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2232 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2164 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2193 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2169 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2191 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2165 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2209 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2163 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2197 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2167 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2220 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2173 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2199 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2166 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2211 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2171 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2207 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2172 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2218 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2044 OF 2012 WITH Mr. S. S. Dande, advocate for the applicant-acquiring body. Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Respondent No.2.

Mr. V. P. Latange, Mr. B. N. Palve, Mr. S. S. Deshmukh, Mr. R. R. Karpe and Mr. N. V. Gaware, advocate for Respondentsclaimants. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 07th February, 2023.

{4} PC :

Since the appellant-acquiring body has deposited the entire amounts of impugned awards, in all these matters, the applications are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (A) and disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb