Sandip Walmik Nangurde And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3996 OF 2021 IN FAST/9123/2021 NANA YADAV NANGURDE (DIED) THR LRS RAOSAHEB AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

AND 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4164 OF 2021 IN FAST/5719/2021 CHANDRABHAN YADAVRAO NANGURDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

AND 908 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4166 OF 2021 IN FAST/5715/2021 SANDIP WALMIK NANGURDE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicants : Ms. Sangeeta Pahune Patil h/f. Mr. Pahune Patil Nandkishor J.

AGP for Respondent/s - State : Mr. S. R.

Yadav - Lonikar ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 19.10.2022 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respondent No. 2 - Acquiring Body though served, but remained absent. The respective applicants

in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications. The delay appears to be caused due to their financial crisis. The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that the delay is not properly explained. 2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay periods as mentioned in these applications are condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the said delay periods.

3.

Appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

The applications are disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-