← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3136/2006disposed offdismissed for default

Kalu Ramdas Patil v. Bhatu Ganjidhar Patil And ORS.

2019-11-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav1 pages

wp3136.06 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 WRIT PETITION NO.3136 OF 2006 KALU RAMDAS PATIL

VERSUS

BHATU GANJIDHAR PATIL AND OTHERS .....

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S. V. Dixit h/f N. R. Katneshwarkar AGP for Respondent No.3-State : Mr. S. K. Tambe Advocate for Respondents : Mr. K. J. Suryawanshi .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 21st NOVEMBER, 2019 PER COURT:- Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that by efflux of time this petition has become infructuous. It appears that the petitioner has raised Gram Panchayat Dispute No. 73 of 2005 pertaining to the election of the year 2003 before the Additional Collector, Jalgaon and sought declaration that respondent No.1 herein is disqualified from being a member of the Gram Panchayat on account of invalidation of his caste certificate. Though the objection raised by the petitioner came to be sustained, however, the petitioner was not declared as elected and therefore, the petitioner has preferred this writ petition. The term pertaining to the election of the year 2003 is over long back. The writ petition has now become meaningless. In view of the same, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as infructuous. Rule discharged.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/