Kishor Tarachand Taur v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

{1} crappln43221.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 432 OF 2021 Kishor s/o Tarachand Taur Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. B. G. Londhe, advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. J. Salgare, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. B. S. Dhawale, advocate for Respondent No.2 (appointed) CORAM : V.K.JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 26th October, 2021.

PC :

We have heard learned Counsel for the applicant for some time.

Learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to the applicant to fle an application for discharge before the trial Court, in the pending case.

Leave granted. Application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant-accused to fle an application for

{2} crappln43221.odt discharge before the trial Court, in the pending case, if the charge is not yet framed.

We quantify legal fees and expenses of the Counsel appointed for Respondent No.2 at Rs.2000/- (Rs. Two thousand) to be paid by the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee at Aurangabad.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V.K.JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb