Sambhaji Kundlik Shirsath v. Surekha Sambhaji Shirsath

1 WP - 1894-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1894 OF 2014 SAMBHAJI KUNDLIK SHIRSATH

VERSUS

SUREKHA SAMBHAJI SHIRSATH ...

Mr. B.S. Shinde, Advocate for petitioner ...

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 14-12-2017 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, who refers to that application for sending marriage certificate which is a photocopy, to handwriting expert, has been rejected, since the original is not available.

2.

Having regard to the aforesaid, learned counsel resiles to situation that in the absence of any original, it would not be worthwhile to send photocopy for opinion by handwriting expert. In the circumstances, he submits that leave may be granted to renew the request for sending document to handwriting expert in case the original is produced.

2 WP - 1894-2014 3.

To this submission, there is no counter argument on behalf of the respondent, who had been given ample and repeated opportunities to cause appearance.

4.

In the circumstances, it is expedient that in case the original of concerned document is produced before the court, petitioner may renew the request, and same be decided in accordance with law by the court.

5.

With this observation, writ petition is disposed of. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE arp/