Bombay High CourtWP/2294/2018disposed offdismissed for default
Uttam Eknath Mudiraj v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
2018-02-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane1 pages
{1} wp229418.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2294 OF 2018 Uttam s/o Eknath Mudiraj Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.N.G.Talekar, advocate with Mr.Pankaj B.Bharat, advocate for the petitioner.
Mrs.P.V.Diggikar, A.G.P. for Respondents.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE AND K.K.SONAWANE, JJ.
DATE : 28 th February, 2018.
P.C. :
In view of availability of alternate remedy for redressal of the grievance raised by the petitioner, in the instant petition, no interference is called for.
Keeping an option open to the petitioner to avail of the remedies available in law, writ petition is disposed of. K.K.SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/