Divisional Controller v. Sitaram S/O Pundalik Deshmukhe

{1} 14-ca2190.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2190 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 5423 OF 2023 Divisional Controller, MSRTC Applicant

Versus

Sitaram s/o Pundalik Deshmukhe Respondent Ms. Divya Attri, advocate holding for Mr. A. D. Wange, advocate for the Applicant CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 19th June, 2023.

PC :

The applicant-MSRTC is seeking condonation of delay of only 93 days.

Considering the short period of the delay, it stands condoned.

Appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

Civil Application is disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb

{2} 14-ca2190.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2191 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 5423 OF 2023 Divisional Controller, MSRTC Applicant

Versus

Sitaram s/o Pundalik Deshmukhe Respondent Ms. Divya Attri, advocate holding for Mr. A. D. Wange, advocate for the Applicant CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 19th June, 2023.

PC :

Since the appellant-MSRTC has deposited entire amount of compensation along with interest, the application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause {B} and disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb