Mahesh Tuljiram Londhe v. The State Of Maharashtra
2025:BHC-AUG:6844 16-ABA.291.2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 16 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 291 OF 2025 MAHESH TULJIRAM LONDHE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...
Mr. Shrikant G. Kawade, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. S. P. Shirse, APP for Respondent-State.
...
CORAM :
ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE :
10.03.2025 P.C.:- 1] Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.
2] The Applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with FIR No.524/2023 dated 24.12.2023 registered at Tuljapur Police Station, District Osmanabad, for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 324, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 3] The case against the Applicant is that on 16.12.2023, the Applicant had assaulted the informant for not returning his money with 20% interest. It is stated that the Applicant along with co-accused has assaulted the informant. The learned counsel points out that one of the co-accused who has assaulted the informant with iron rod, has been granted anticipatory bail by the District Court vide order dated 03.09.2024 in this crime. Considering the same and considering the role attributed to the Applicant and having perused the injury certificate showing that the injuries are simple, anticipatory bail can be granted to the Applicant.
Tauseef
16-ABA.291.2025 4] In view of the above, the application is allowed in following terms.
i] The Applicant/accused shall attend the concerned police station on every Saturday in between 10.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m. till filing of the charge-sheet. ii] The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. The Applicant shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.
iii] The Applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court. 5] In the event, the Applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled. 6] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove. 7] The application stands disposed of.
(ARUN R. PEDNEKER) JUDGE Tauseef