Gaurishankar Rukhmeshchandra Mishra v. Asaram Shankar Jagdale And ORS

5416.2012CA.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5416 OF 2012 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 356 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5417 OF 2012 Gaurishankar s/o.Rukhmeshchandra Mishra ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Asaram s/o. Shankar Jagdale, and others.

..RESPONDENTS ...

Mr.A.N.Nagargoje, Advocate for the Applicant Mr.S.V. Adwant, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 and 8 ...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE, J.

Date : 8th September, 2016 PER COURT :

Not on board. On mentioning, taken on board.

2.

The learned counsel appearing for Respondent nos. 4 and 8 submits that he has already given notice to the learned counsel appearing for the review applicant.

5416.2012CA.odt 3.

This matter is moved for speaking to the minutes. It appears that, in the judgment dated 30th August, 2016, instead of appearance of "Mr.P.M. Shah, Senior Counsel, instructed by Mr. S.V. Adwant, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 and 8", inadvertently it is mentioned as "Mr.P.M. Shah, Senior Counsel, instructed by Mr. S.V. Savant, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 and 8".

4.

The name of Advocate Mr.S.V. Savant be substituted by Advocate Mr.S.V. Adwant in the judgment dated 30th August, 2016.

5.

The motion is disposed of accordingly.

[S.S.SHINDE] JUDGE sga