Hariprasad Tatyasaheb Kulkarni And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
1 31-WP-2825-2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2825 OF 2020 Hariprasad s/o Tatyasaheb Kulkarni and Anr.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr G.K. Naik (Thigle), Advocate holding for Mr D.D. Deshmukh, Advocate for Petitioners Mr S.G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondent-State CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 17th FEBRUARY, 2020 PER COURT :
1.
The proposal seeking approval to the transfer of the petitioners from unaided to aided is rejected. 2.
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
3.
The proposal seeking approval to the transfer of the petitioners from unaided to aided is rejected basically on the ground of circular dated 28.06.2016.
2 31-WP-2825-2020 4.
This Court in its judgment dated 4th July, 2019 in Writ Petition No. 1493 of 2018 with connected writ petitions held that some of the clauses of circular dated 28.06.2016 do not apply. 5.
Of course, the respondent No. 2- Education Ofcer (Secondary) has to consider the roster, the seniority, and the qualification.
6.
In light of that, the impugned order is quashed and set aside.
7.
The Education Ofcer (Secondary) shall reconsider the proposal seeking approval to the transfer of the petitioners from unaided to aided in tune with the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No. 1493 of 2018 with connected writ petitions dated 4th July, 2019.
8.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. [ SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J. ] [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] mta