← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/4483/2017disposed offdismissed for default

The State Of Maharashtra And ANR v. Suresh Machindra Galande

2017-08-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4345/2017 IN FAST/5798/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

SHIVAJI KARBHARI RAUT 924 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4347/2017 IN FAST/5859/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

TUKARAM BHIKAJI RAUT 925 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4349/2017 IN FAST/6104/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

KARBHARI GENU BHALDAND (DEAD) THR LRS MARUTI KARBHARIBHALDAND AND ORS 926 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4483 OF 2017 IN FAST/5844/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

SURESH MACHINDRA GALANDE 927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4496 OF 2017 IN FAST/5850/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

VINAYAK FAKIRA GULVE 928 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4502 OF 2017 IN FAST/6107/2017

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

SUREKHA EKNATH TAKE 929 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4504 OF 2017 IN FAST/6086/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

UMA RAMESH GALANDE ...

930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4507 OF 2017 IN FAST/6110/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

ANNA PRUTHVIRAJ TAKE 931 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4509 OF 2017 IN FAST/5793/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

BHASKAR RABHAJI TAK ...

932 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4511 OF 2017 IN FAST/6113/2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

VERSUS

LAHANUBAI GANGADHAR TAKE (DEAD) THR LRS VISHNU (DEAD)SHAMSUNDER VISHNU TAKE AND ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr B V Virdhe/A M Phule/S S Dande/S N Morampalle Advocate for Respondents : Mr P B Shirsath ...

CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J.

Dated: August 03, 2017 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

The learned AGP submits that, due to administrative difficulties, the appeals could not be preferred within a period of limitation. Delay is not intentional one and the applicant State was prevented from sufficient cause to prefer an appeal within a period of limitation.

2.

Learned counsel for respondent-original claimant/s has strongly resisted the application on the ground that delay has not been explained satisfactorily.

3.

In view of submissions made on behalf of the applicant-State and for the reasons stated in the application, delay caused in filing the appeal/s is hereby condoned. Civil applications for condonation of delay are accordingly allowed and disposed of.

( V.K. JADHAV, J. )