← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/56/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Anjali W/O Sachin Tak v. Sachin S/O Ravindra Tak

2017-04-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh2 pages

1 MCA - 56-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2016 Anjali W/o Sachin Tak, Age : 26 years, Occu.: Household, R/o : C/o : Pandharinath Asaram Dahiwal, Plot No. 13, 14, "Shivshakti Housing Society", Harsool, Aurangabad, Tq. & District Aurangabad .. Applicant VS.

Sachin S/o Ravindra Tak, Age : 30 years, Occu.: Service, R/o : Near Gajanan Maharaj Temple, Navale Nagar, Gulmohar Road, Ahmednagar, Taluka and District : Ahmednagar .. Respondent ---- Mr. Govind A. Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicant None present for the respondent though served ---- CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 19-04-2017 ORAL JUDGMENT :

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant. None appears for the respondent despite couple of chances. 3.

Learned counsel for the applicant states that after lodging two proceedings at Aurangabad at her instance, the

2 MCA - 56-2016 proceedings bearing Hindu Marriage Petition no. 568 of 2015 has been lodged for dissolution of marriage by respondent at Ahmendnagar. He refers to host of difficulties being faced by the applicant. He submits that it is difficult for the applicant to attend to the proceedings at Ahmednagar instituted by the respondent. 4.

In the absence of resistance to the submissions advanced on behalf of the applicant as aforesaid, and, particularly having regard to that respondent is already attending to proceedings at Aurangabad, it appears to be expedient to grant the application. 5.

As such, miscellaneous civil application stands granted in terms of prayer clause (B) and is disposed of. 6.

Rule made absolute accordingly.

[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE arp/