Pradeep Murlidharrao Shinde And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

987-ca-6565-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 987 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6565 OF 2018 IN FAST/5256/2018 WITH CA/6566/2018 IN FAST/5847/2018 AJIT SHRIDHAR SHINDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Patil Mahesh S.

AGP for Respondents/State : Mr.A.M. Phule Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Arora.

...

CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

DATE : 23rd AUGUST, 2019 ORDER :

.

Learned Advocate Mr. Arora makes a statement that he has instructions to appear for respondent No.2-acquiring body. He may file his Vakalatnama on or before 06.09.2019.

2.

Both the applications have been filed by the original claimants for getting the delay of 53 and 59 days condoned respectively. Learned AGP as well as learned Advocate for respondent No.2 vehemently opposes the applications on the ground that the reasons those have been mentioned, are not sufficient and reasonable. However, taking into consideration the fact that the applicants are the persons whose land have been acquired and for the reasons mentioned in

987-ca-6565-18.doc paragraph No.5 of the applications, the delay in both the applications stand condoned.

3.

Both the applications stand allowed and disposed of accordingly.

4.

It is clarified that the respective applicants will not be entitled to get interest of 53 and 59 days in case of success to their appeals.

5.

Registry to verify and register the first appeals and place them for further consideration on 10.12.2019. ( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. ) Shubham/