Bhimasankar Narayan Mustapure And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2025:BHC-AUG:6541 1 927 ca 5383-22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5383 OF 2022 IN FAST/6183/2021 BHIMASANKAR NARAYAN MUSTAPURE AND ANR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Mr. Anerao Panditrao S, Advocate for Applicants Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State Ms. Vaishali N. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.3 ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 06/03/2025.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 2375 days, which appears to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 3.

The learned counsel for the acquiring body and the learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay.

4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed subject to cost of Rs.3,500/- to be paid to Registry, for utilization of High Court Dispensary.

5.

It is made clear that the applicants shall not claim any interest and statutory benefits for the period of aforesaid delay.

2 927 ca 5383-22 6.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

7.

The application is accordingly disposed of.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-