← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2226/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Mohini Shankarrao Sangade And Another v. State Of Maharashtra And Another

2015-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya5 pages

UNREPORTED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT

BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO.2226 OF 2015.

1. Mohini D/o Shankarrao Sangade, Age 27 years, Occ.Nil, R/o Bhagyashali Nagar, Beed, Tal. And Dist.Beed.

2. Sharda D/o Kerba Khod, Age 35 years, Occ.Nil, R/o Wasanwadi, Tal and Dist.Beed.

... Petitioners.

Versus

1. The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Beed.

... Respondents.

...

WRIT PETITION NO.2239 OF 2015

1. Ratnamala D/o Babasaheb Pingale, Age 27 years, Occ.Nil, R/o Wasanwadi, Tal.& Dist.Beed.

2. Lata D/o Damodhar Shinde,

Age 30 years, Occ.Nil, R/o Palwan Chowk, Tal.

& Dist.Beed.

... Petitioners.

Versus

1. The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya,Mumbai.

2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad Beed, Tal and Dist.Beed.

3. The Edcuation Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad Beed, Tal and Dist.Beed.

... Respnodents.

...

Mr.P.K.Wagh, advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr.G.K.Naik Thigle, Addl. Govt. Pleader, Mrs.S.A.Dhumal, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for the State.

Mr.R.B.Dhawale, advocate for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

...

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ.

Date : 26.02.2015.

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.) 1.

The learned counsel for petitioners states that, the petitioners would restrict the present writ petitions to the extent that the respondents be directed to decide the representations given by the petitioners.

2.

We have heard the learned counsel for respective parties.

3.

The petitioners were working as Vasti Shala teachers. The same has been closed. The petitioners are seeking appointment as para teachers. The petitioners have given representations to that effect.

4.

It is for the authorities to consider the claim of the petitioners, their eligibility and entitlement. 5.

In the light of that, we pass the following order. 6.

The respondents shall decide the representations filed by petitioners (Exhibit - D) in Writ Petition Nos. 2226 and 2239 of 2015 on its own merits expeditiously and preferably within a period of three (03) months from today. The writ petitions accordingly are disposed of. No costs. (V.L.ACHLIYA,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) asp/office/wp2226.15