← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/2863/2022delay condonatedrejected

The G.M.I.D.C., Thr The Exe. Engineer, Minor Irrigation Div. No.1, Aurangabad v. Krushna Karbhari Kuklare And Others

2022-06-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare2 pages

911 and ors delay.odt (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2863 OF 2022 IN FAST/5577/2022 THE G.M.I.D.C., THR THE EXE. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. NO.1, AURANGABAD

VERSUS

KRUSHNA KARBHARI KUKLARE AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant: Mr. Bhalerao Sudhir G. A.G.P. for Respondents: Mr. G.O. Wattamwar Advocate for Respondent No.1: Ms. L.R. Thakur h/f Mr L.C. Patil AND 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2866 OF 2022 IN FAST/5642/2022 THE G.M.I.D.C., THR THE EXE. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. NO.1, AURANGABAD

VERSUS

PARIGHABAI MANIKRAO TAYDE (DIED) THR LRS., BHAUSAHEB MANIKRAO TAYDE AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant: Mr. Bhalerao Sudhir G. A.G.P. for Respondents: Mrs. D.S. Jape Advocate for Respondent No.1A to 3 : Ms. L.R. Thakur h/f Mr. L.C. Patil AND 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2865 OF 2022 IN FAST/5580/2022 THE EXE. ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIV. NO.1, AURANGABAD

VERSUS

RAMKISAN BHAVSING KUKLARE AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant: Mr. Bhalerao Sudhir G. A.G.P. for Respondents: Mr. P.M. Kulkarni Advocate for Respondent No.1 to 3 : Ms. L.R. Thakur h/f Mr. L.C. Patil ...

CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.

DATED: 07th JUNE, 2022.

911 and ors delay.odt (2) PER COURT:- 1.

The Court has gone through the reasons for the delay mentioned in the application and is satisfied that the reasons given in the application are sufficient to condone the delay. Hence, the applications are allowed.

2.

In appeals, issue notice to the respondents. Learned counsel Smt. L.R. Thakur waived the service of notice for the respective respondents and learned A.G.P. waives service of notice for the State.

3.

Call record and proceedings.

(S.G. MEHARE, J.) Mujaheed//