Pankaj Narayan Patil v. Shri Aseem,Kumar Gupta

2024:BHC-AUG:8194-DB 986 to 989.CP.230.24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 986 CONT. PETITION NO. 230 OF 2024 IN WP/7272/2022 PANKAJ NARAYAN PATIL

VERSUS

SHRI ASEEM,KUMAR GUPTA ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Bhandari Anand P. Addl. G.P. for Respondents: Mr. M.M. Nerlikar Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 : Mr. S.B. Munde ...

AND 987 CONT. PETITION NO. 231 OF 2024 IN WP/13930/2019 SATISH SOMA BHOLE

VERSUS

SHRI ASEEMKUMAR GUPTA ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Bhandari Anand P. AGP for Respondents: Mr. N.R. Dayama Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 : Mr. S.B. Munde ...

AND 988 CONT. PETITION NO. 232 OF 2024 IN WP/14527/2019 NIVRUTTI SHRIDHAR KOLHE

VERSUS

SHRI. ASEEMKUMAR GUPTA ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Bhandari Anand P. AGP for Respondents: Mr. V.K. Kotecha Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 : Mr. S.B. Munde ...

habeeb 1/2

986 to 989.CP.230.24.odt AND 989 CONT. PETITION NO. 233 OF 2024 IN WP/14531/2019 ANIL VITTHAL KOLHE

VERSUS

SHRI ASEEMKUMAR GUPTA ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Bhandari Anand P. AGP for Respondents: Ms. V.N. Patil - Jadhav ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 18.04.2024 PER COURT:

Both the sides are unanimous.

2.

These are the matters, whereby, the respondents were directed to issue notification under Sub-Section 2 of Section 127 regarding dereservation under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

3.

Learned AGP places on record the copies of the notifications issued on 31.08.2023 and 20.03.2024 under Sub-Section 2 of Section 127, covering all the properties of the petitioner's involved in all these matters. The orders having been complied with. The contempt proceedings are closed.

(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb 2/2