Suresh Mahadeo Sul v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:5472-DB 80 WP 2731 25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 80 WRIT PETITION NO. 2731 OF 2025 SURESH MAHADEO SUL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Pawar Ajay D. AGP for Respondents : Mr. V.M. Kagne

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL & PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , JJ.

DATE : 25.02.2025 PER COURT :

The petitioner in this petition, who is a non teaching staff of Private Aided Ashram School run under the Other Backward Bahujan Welfare Department, is seeking declaration regarding applicability of the time bound promotion/Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) to her in the light of the decision in the matter of Kiran Namdeo Shinde Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others, Writ Petition No.2358 of 2023 with connected petitions (Principal Seat) decided on 21.09.2013. 2.

We have heard both the sides.

3.

In Kiran Namdeo Shinde's matter (Supra), for the elaborate reasons recorded therein, it was expressly held that the benefit of ACPS would be applicable even to the non teaching staff of the aided private schools as per the Government Resolution dated 30.04.1998.

4.

Subsequently, even in the matter of Prashant Anandrao Borse and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others, Writ Petition No.4202 of 2012 (Aurangabad Bench) decided on 21.01.2014, it was expressly declared that the scheme evolved by Government Resolutions dated 18.09.2000, 1/2

80 WP 2731 25.odt 08.06.1995 and 27.03.2000 would be applicable to Class-IV/Group-D employees of aided Ashram Schools.

5.

In view of such consistent view being taken by these two benches and the several other subsequent benches in different matters, we allow the writ petition and issue following directions.

i) It is declared that the benefit of ACPS would be applicable to the petitioner who is a non teaching staff of aided Private Schools under the Government Resolution dated 08.06.1995. 27.03.2000, 18.09.2000 and 30.04.1998 as modified by subsequent resolutions issued from time to time. ii) The appropriate authority appointed by the State Government shall examine individual case of the petitioner for deciding whether he satisfies the criteria laid down therein for deriving the benefit of ACPS. The exercise shall be concluded within four (4) months.

iii) The petitioner, if found entitled to derive the benefit, shall be extended the benefit immediately.

( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) mkd/- 2/2