Rahul Asaram Sawant v. The State Of Maharashtra

Bail Appln No.1208/2022 with Bail Appln No.319/2022 :: 1 ::

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO.1208 OF 2022 Nikitesh Ankush Magare ... APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT .......

Mr. S.G. Bobde, Advocate for applicant Mr. V.S. Badakh, A.P.P. for respondent - State .......

WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO.319 OF 2022 Rahul s/o Asaram Sawant ... APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra ... RESPONDENT .......

Mr. M.M. Parghane, Advocate for applicant Mr. V.S. Badakh, A.P.P. for respondent - State .......

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2380 OF 2022 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.319 OF 2022 Krishna s/o Ramesh Jaybhaye ... APPLICANT

VERSUS

Rahul s/o Asaram Sawant ... RESPONDENT .......

Mr. P.M. Nagargoje, Advocate for applicant Mr. M.M. Parghane, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. V.S. Badakh, A.P.P. for respondent No.2 - State .......

Bail Appln No.1208/2022 with Bail Appln No.319/2022 :: 2 ::

CORAM :

R. G. AVACHAT, J.

DATE :

7th OCTOBER, 2022.

PER COURT :

Criminal Application No.2380/2022 is allowed. The original complainant is permitted to assist learned A.P.P. 2.

After having heard learned counsel for the applicants, the Court expressed disinclination to grant the applicants bail. It is made clear that, all the police papers were not scrutinised threadbare. Both the learned counsel for the respective applicants, therefore, came around to withdraw the Bail Applications with liberty to move before the trial Court for bail after a lapse of certain time. The Bail Applications thus stand disposed of as withdrawn.

3.

The trial Court is requested to frame the charge within two months and conclude the trial within next six months. If the trial could not be concluded within the given time-frame, the applicants will have liberty to revive their prayer for bail.

( R. G. AVACHAT, J. ) fmp/-