Priyanka Sunil Kothule And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 27-WP-2972-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2972 OF 2022 KU. PRIYANKA SUNIL KOTHULE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Yuvraj V. Kakde AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. P. N. Kutti Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : Mr. V. H. Dighe ...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.

DATE : 28th FEBRUARY, 2022 PER COURT :

1.

The petitioners are aggrieved by deletion of their names from the voters list of respondent No.4 Society, on objections taken by respondent Nos. 5 to 11. The learned advocate for petitioners strenuously argued that the impugned order is contrary to the provisions of Rule 8 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 2014. Without hearing the petitioners their names are erroneously deleted from the voters list.

2.

The learned advocate representing respondent Nos. 2 and 3, on the other hand, by placing reliance on the decision of the Division Bench this Court at Principal Seat in Dattatray Genaba Lole and Others Vs. The Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Pune and Others, Writ Petition No.5878/2021, submitted that the petitioner has

2 27-WP-2972-22.odt alternate efficacious remedy, hence, the petition may be dismissed. In that case, challenge was raised to the dismissal of the objection application and the preparation of provisional voters' list from which the petitioner's name was excluded. These were held to be intermediate stages in the election process contemplated under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act and Rules. The Division Bench held that, in view of the availability of alternate efficacious remedy under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, read with Rule 78 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014, the petition is not maintainable.

3.

In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy. All the contentions of the petitioner are kept open.

(NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH