Gorakhnath Mukunda Tathe v. Machindra Sonaji Rautray And ORS

1 31 CA 3301-23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 31 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3301 OF 2023 IN FAST/5796/2023 WITH CA/3302/2023 IN FAST/5796/2023 GORAKHNATH MUKUNDA TATHE

VERSUS

MACHINDRA SONAJI RAUTRAY AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R. B. Dhakane ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 05/06/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant. The respondents despite service, remained absent.

2.

The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 293 days in filing appeal, whhich appears to be caused due to his poor financial condition. There is no oppose to the application. As such, the delay of 293 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay. The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The application is disposed of.

4.

Call R & P.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-