Prakash Dasharathrao Sable And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
1 947,949-wp-4471,4473-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4471 OF 2019 Gajanan Sampatrao Shinde Mirza Masood Baig Mirza Ahemad Baig Jabhar Kha Daulat Kha Pathan Chandrbhan Bhikaj Paighan Sanjay Gajanan Parankar Bhimrao Kachru Ingle Baliram Haribhau Pawar 8.
Misbahur Raheman Habibur Raheman 9.
Janardan Shankarrao Bhosle 10.
Dilip Kesharchand Kanhed 11.
Sudarshan Arunrao Sovitkar 12.
Baban Chokhaji Dandekar 13.
Smt. Ashwini Nagnathrao Kurundkar 14.
Smt. Mira Rangnath Gange 15.
Abhinandan Narayanrao Ghongade 16.
Ramesh Sudamrao Ingole 17.
Devidas Dattatray Gunjkar 18.
Manoj Dharmaraj Karnewar ... Petitioners
Versus
Through its Principal Secretary, School Education Department Through its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Through its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Conservation Department, The State of Maharashtar Through its Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.
2 947,949-wp-4471,4473-19.doc The Divisional Commissioner (Education) Aurangabad.
The Chief Executive Officer, Hingoli, Tq. & Dist. Hingoli.
The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Hingoli.
... Respondents ....
Mr. S. K. Mathpati, Advocate for petitioners. Ms. P. V. Diggikar, AGP for the State.
Mr. S. B. Ghule, Advocate for respondent Nos. 6 and 7. ....
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4473 OF 2019 Prakash Dasharathrao Sable Shankar Ramchandra Navgankar Maliba Baburao Chandmare Smt. Lata Jagannathrao Pargaonkar Smt. Manda Vishwanath Saruk Laxman Rambhau Sagle Smt. Rajkannya Vitthaldas kabra 8.
Sahebrao Hema Rathod 9.
Shankar Pandurangrao Suryawanshi 10.
Smt. Sunita Sakharam Waghmare 11.
Smt. Surekha Shrihari Mote 12.
Smt. Balika Venkatrao Jadhav 13.
Dhondiram Vaijnath Waghmare 14.
Suryakant Rambhau Jogdand 15.
Mahadev Sakharam Dabhade 16.
Narayan Ganpatrao Marathe 17.
Mahadev Khemaji Bhandwalkar 18.
Smt. Chaya Sanjivanrao Pore 19.
Ganesh Bansidhar Shahane ... Petitioners
Versus
Through its Principal Secretary, School Education Department Through its Principal Secretary, Finance Department,
3 947,949-wp-4471,4473-19.doc Through its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Conservation Department, The State of Maharashtar Through its Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.
The Divisional Commissioner Aurangabad.
The Chief Executive Officer, Beed, Tq. & Dist. Beed.
The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Beed.
... Respondents ....
Mr. S. K. Mathpati, Advocate for petitioners Ms. D. S. Jape, AGP for the State.
Mr. K.B. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent Nos. 6 and 7. ....
CORAM :
PRASANNA B. VARALE AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ DATED : 09th APRIL, 2019 PER COURT:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue raised in these petitions is clearly covered by the judgment of this Court dated 25/01/2019 in bunch of petitions i.e. Writ Petition No.1954 of 2018 and other connected petitions.
4 947,949-wp-4471,4473-19.doc Notice made returnable forthwith. Learned AGP waives notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Learned counsel in support of submission state that the petitioners are the Awardi Teachers. Our attention is invited to the copies of certificate issued to that effect in favour of petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 6 and 7 admits before us that the petitioners are similarly circumstanced/situated like that of the petitioners in Writ Petition No. 1954 of 2018 and other connected petitions.
We see no reason to take different view than the view taken by the Division Bench in order dated 25/01/2019 passed in Writ Petition No. 1954 of 2018 and other connected petitions. As such, the petitions are disposed of with directions to respondent Nos. 6 and 7 that after confirming themselves of the petitioners being District Awardee Teachers and awarded certificate prior to 04/09/2018 shall individually consider the case of the petitioners for additional increment as is laid down under the Govt. Resolution dated 12/12/2000. The same shall be considered on its own merits expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of this order.
Writ petitions are accordingly disposed of.
( NITIN W. SAMBRE ) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE SMS