← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/2137/2025admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Maharashtra State Road Transport Carporetion Parbhani v. Baban Mahadu Kamble And ANR

2025-04-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:10692 85-ca-2137-2025.odt (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2137 OF 2025 IN FAST/5914/2025 Maharashtra State Road Transport Carporetion Parbhani

VERSUS

Baban Mahadu Kamble And Anr ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Dnyaneshwar Suresh Bagul Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. S.V. Suryawanshi WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2138 OF 2025 IN FAST/5914/2025 ...

CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATED : APRIL 08, 2025 PER COURT :

1.

Heard Mr. Bagul, learned advocate appearing for the applicant.

2.

The applicant seeks to condone delay of 68 days caused in filing the appeal.

3.

Perused the application and reasons as stated therein. Apparently, delay is occasioned on account of administrative exigency. The applicant has not derived any advantage by making such delay. In that view of the matter, sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay. Hence, following order :

O R D E R

(i) The application is allowed.

(ii) Delay of 68 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned.

85-ca-2137-2025.odt (2) (iii) Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objections. Stay Application :- 4.

Heard Mr. Bagul, learned advocate appearing for the applicant.

5.

Mr. Bagul, learned advocate appearing for the applicant submits that the entire amount as per the award passed under appeal has been deposited with the registry of this Court. His statement is supported by office endorsement.

6.

In that view of the matter, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (C) and disposed of.

(S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) Mujaheed//