Rukhmanbai Sitaram More And ANR v. Nasar Khan Munshi Khan And ORS

1 974 CA-2853-18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 974 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2853 OF 2018 IN FA/3757/2016 RUKHMANBAI SITARAM MORE AND ANR

VERSUS

NASAR KHAN MUNSHI KHAN AND ORS ...

Mr. Swapnil S. Rathi, Advocate for Applicants Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for respondent No. 3 CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : 23rd MARCH, 2018.

Order :- 1.

Learned counsel for applicants states that address of respondents No. 1 and 2 had been same before the motor accident claims tribunal. They were tried to be served on the same addresses in the first appeal, however, that effort had been futile. Those are the only addresses known and despite efforts their whereabouts could not be traced out, in the circumstances, it is expedient to allow the application.

2.

In view of aforesaid submission, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses "B" and "C" and is disposed of. [ SUNIL P. DESHMUKH ] JUDGE MTK.