Turab Maqbul Baig And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 932 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4653 OF 2020 IN FAST/5921/2019 LAXMAN GOVINDRAO WAGHMARE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

AND 936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4678 OF 2020 IN FAST/6027/2019 TURAB MAQBUL BAIG AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. S.

V. Bhopi h/f.

Mr. Hande Avinash D.

AGP for Respondent/s - State : Mr. P. M. Kulkarni , Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Surwase B.R. ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 12.10.2022 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned in both these applications.

The delay appears to be caused due to financial crisis of the applicants.

2.

The learned counsel for the Acquiring Body as well as learned

AGP strongly opposed the applications on the ground that there is also circulation delay.

3.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the respective delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay periods and also for delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

4.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-