← Library
Bombay High Court/204/2024compramised

Arjun Sakharam Dushing v. Fulabai Nana Jadhav (Died) Thr Lrs Raju Nana Jadhav And ORS

2024-09-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

(1) 921- SA-204-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 SECOND APPEAL NO. 204 OF 2024 ARJUN SAKHARAM DUSHING

VERSUS

FULABAI NANA JADHAV (DIED) THR LRS RAJU NANA JADHAV AND ORS ...

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ajinkya H. Narke h/f Mr. S.R. Sapkal Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. B. Kadu ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : September 19, 2024 ORDER:- 1.

The parties have arrived at settlement and accordingly compromise terms in this appeal were entered into and the same were marked as "X" for identification. Those compromise terms vide order dated 18.09.2024 were referred to the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court for verification of the contents through parties. Accordingly, the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court submitted his report dated 18.09.2024 by mentioning that the parties have voluntarily entered into compromise terms (X).

2.

Therefore, those compromise terms are accepted and the appeal is disposed of in terms of the same . Decree be drawn in

(2) 921- SA-204-24.odt terms of those compromise terms.

3.

Pending Civil Applications, if any, are also disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) Y.S. Kulkarni