Bombay High CourtWP/1952/2014disposed offdismissed for default
Narendra Suklal Bagul v. Dnyaneshwar Pitambar Patil And Others
2017-11-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh1 pages
1 WP - 1952-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1952 OF 2014 NARENDRA SUKLAL BAGUL
VERSUS
DNYANESHWAR PITAMBAR PATIL AND OTHERS ...
Mr. Shaikh Ashraf Patel, Advocate h/f Mr. A.P. Avhad, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S.N. Morampalle, AGP for respondent-Sate ...
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 28-11-2017 ORDER :
1.
Learned counsel for petitioner states that purpose underlying writ petition gets worked out under interim relief, as has been granted by this court, as the term of election of petitioner has expired.
2.
As such, it does not appear that petition would be surviving for any fruitful order. Writ petition, therefore, is disposed of.
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE arp/