Shaikh Suleman Shaikh Bhayya v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

944-CA.1965-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 944 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1965 OF 2021 IN RAST/6172/2020 IN PIL/123/19 SHAIKH SULEMAN SHAIKH BHAYYA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Gaikwad Satish A. AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. S. P. Tiwari. Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : Mrs. V. A. Shinde-More. ...

CORAM : R. D. DHANUKA, AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ.

DATE : 22.04.2022 PER COURT :- 1.

By this Civil Application, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 65 days in filing review application in PIL No.123 of 2019.

2.

None appears for respondent Nos.5 and 6, when the matter was called out. None of the respondents have filed an affidavit-in-reply. We have perused the averments made in the Civil Application seeking condonation of delay. Delay is sufficiently explained in the Civil Application. Civil Application is accordingly made absolute in prayer clause "B". No order as to costs.

944-CA.1965-21.odt 3.

Place the review application on board on 07.06.2022. (S. G. MEHARE, J.) (R. D. DHANUKA, J.) ...

vmk/-