← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6489/2018admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Tukaram Nana Magar v. Vitthal Narayanrao Kulkarni

2018-09-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya1 pages

CA in SA - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6489 OF 2018 IN SA/209/2017 TUKARAM NANA MAGAR

VERSUS

VITTHAL NARAYANRAO KULKARNI ...

Advocate for Applicant : Shri Muley Pramod N Advocate for Respondent : Shri S. Y. Mahajan CORAM: V.L. ACHLIYA, J.

DATE: 26.09.2018 PER COURT :

1] The applicant has taken out this application seeking restoration of the appeal which was dismissed on account of non-removal of office objections.

2] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the respondent. Perused the order dated 19.1.2018. 3] Considering the reason assigned for failure to remove the office objections within time, I am of the view that in the larger interest, the application deserves to be allowed.

4] Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses [A] and [C] on condition that the applicant shall remove office objections within two weeks.

5] The application is disposed of in above terms. (V.L. ACHLIYA, J.) ndk/c2691816.doc