Shri Ganpati Dev Deosthan Parner Through Its Chairman v. Kundlik Laxman Pathaare And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:5488 Ethape ( 1 ) 914- WP-2749-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 WRIT PETITION NO. 2749 OF 2025 Shri Ganpati Dev Deosthan Parner Through Its Chairman

VERSUS

Kundlik Laxman Pathaare And Others ...

Mr.Saurabh Veer i/by Talekar And Associates, Advocate for the Petitioner.

CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 25th FEBRUARY 2025 PC :- 1.

This petition is filed challenging the order dated 21st January 2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Ahmednagar which reads as under: "Heard both sides. By consent it is agreed that this application shall be decided alongwith main appeal. Ld. Counsel for appellant submitted that till disposal of this appeal, his structure should be protected from demolition. This request is opposed by Ld. Counsel for respondents. In my view, this appeal can be disposed of within short span as it involves issue which is not complex. Hence, till disposal of this appeal respondent Nagar Panchayat, Parner is restrained from demolishing the suit structure. Both Ld. Counsel are directed to

Ethape ( 2 ) 914- WP-2749-2025 furnish their arguments on 21.1.25 without fail." 2.

Now, only grievance is made that though the Court was expected to pass an order on 21st January 2025, the Court had adjourned the matter to 15th March 2025. The petitioner has also filed an application for intervention. However, the said is not being taken up by the Court. Now, one more prayer is made seeking direction to the District Judge, Ahmednagar to hear the petitioner and decide the Misc.Civil Application No.158 of 2024 expeditiously and preferably within four weeks. 3.

This Court hardly finds any reason to interfere and to consider such prayers when the matter is seized with the learned District Judge, Ahmednagar. Expecting the High Court to pass even such direction to the Courts to pass order within two weeks or within stipulated period certainly not warranted. Petition thus stands dismissed. No order as to costs.

[KISHORE C. SANT, J.]