Ramesh Laxman Mali v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

wp2615.16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2615 OF 2016 Ramesh s/o Laxman Mali ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and others.

...RESPONDENTS ...

Ms. Seema T. Pawar Advocate h/f. Mr. D.B.

Thoke Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr.P.S. Patil, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos.1 to 3.

...

CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 8TH MARCH, 2016 ORDER :

1.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, states that the proposal of the Petitioner subsequently, is rejected and the proposal of another person to be nominated as Councillor is accepted. Learned counsel, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Petition

wp2615.16 with liberty to assail the decision of the Collector in this regard.

2.

We have heard learned A.G.P. also.

3.

Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. No costs.

[A.I.S.CHEEMA,J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] asb/MAR16