← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2430/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Adarsha Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha Khed Through Its Secretary Limbraj Tulshiram Tikle And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-06-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde3 pages

1 18-wp2430-16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2430 OF 2016 1] Adarsha Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha Khed, Tq. and Dist. Osmanabad through its Secretary Limbraj s/o. Tulshiram Tikle, Age 66 years, Occ. Agri., r/o. Khed, Tq. and Dist. Osmanabad 2] Lal Bahadur Shastri Higher Secondary School, Khed, Tq. and Dist. Osmanabad, through its Principal namely, Sharad s/o. Vasant Baswant, Age 55 years, Occ. Service, r/o. Khed, Tq. and Dist. Osmanabad ..Petitioners Vs.

1] The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, School Education and Sports Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 2] The Director of Education, Maharashtra State, Pune 3] Deputy Director of Education, Latur Division, Latur 4] Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad ..Respondents

2 18-wp2430-16.odt -- Mr.A.N.Nagargoje, Advocate for petitioners Mr.V.H.Dighe, AGP for respondents -- CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 22, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard.

2] The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petition can be conveniently disposed of in the light of the averments made in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the affidavit-in-reply filed by respondent no.4.

3] Upon perusal of paragraphs 9 and 10 of the affidavit-in-reply of respondent no.4, it appears that the respondent/authority has sanctioned two divisions for each standards i.e. 11th standard and 12th standard. One division is on grant-in-aid basis and another on non-grant basis. It is further stated in paragraph 10 of the affidavit-

3 18-wp2430-16.odt in-reply that pursuant to the information/proposal submitted by the petitioner - School for the academic years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, the respondent/authority has considered the proposal and sanctioned the staffing pattern by granting two divisions, as stated above.

4] In that view of the matter, according to the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the purpose of filing this Writ Petition is served. 5] In the light of the above, the Writ petition stands disposed of.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.] kbp