← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5150/2020delay condonatedrejected

Navnath Rajaram Kharade v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2023-07-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

1 978 & 979 ca 5150-20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 978 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5150 OF 2020 IN FAST/6132/2019 WITH CA/5152/2020 IN FAST/4767/2019 WITH CA/5151/2020 IN FAST/6137/2019 NAVNATH RAJARAM KHARADE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A. T. Jadhavar AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. B. V. Virdhe ...

AND 979 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5153 OF 2020 IN FAST/6076/2019 WITH CA/5154/2020 IN FAST/6125/2019 WITH CA/5155/2020 IN FAST/6128/2019 ANKUSH LAXIMAN WARPE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A. T. Jadhavar AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. S. P. Tiwari ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 12/07/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor fnancial condition.

3.

The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods. The acquiring body though served, but remained absent.

2 978 & 979 ca 5150-20 4.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay. 5.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

6.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-