Payal Sunil Taru v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} wp2902.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2902 OF 2019 Payal d/o Sunil Taru Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. M.S. Deshmukh, advocate for petitioner.

Mrs. P.V. Diggikar, AGP for respondents no. 1 and 2. CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ.

DATE : 13th March, 2019.

P.C. :

Heard Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel appearing for petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceeding as and when the proceeding initiated against the uncle of petitioner Suresh Padmakar Taru concludes. 3.

Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.

4.

Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

{2} wp2902.19.odt NITIN W. SAMBRE PRASANNA B. VARALE JUDGE JUDGE dyb