Madhav Ramkrushna Patil v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

(1) 947 CA-1315.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 947 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1315 OF 2022 IN FAST/6284/2020 WITH CA/1316/2022 IN FAST/6282/2020 MADHAV RAMKRUSHNA PATIL

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. H.B. Nandagavale, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. S.N. Kendre, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Bipinchandra K. Patil, Advocate for respondent No.3. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

20.12.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 381 days in filing the appeal. The delay appears to be caused due to their financial crisis. The learned Counsel for Acquiring Body strongly opposed the application on the ground that there is also circulation delay.

2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the applications are allowed and the delay of 381 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay period and also for the delay in circulating the matters belatedly.

(2) 947 CA-1315.2022.odt 3.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections.

4.

The Civil Applications are disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde