Rumana Tarrannum Sayyad Mukhatar Ali v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 Sr31 WP2779.2017 & Anr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 2779 OF 2017 Rumana Tarrannum Sayyad Mukhatar Ali ... Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents ..........

Mr M. D. Narwadkar, Advocate for the petitioner A. V. Deshmukh, AGP for respondent/State Mr P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondents no. 3 and 4 .............

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13818 OF 2017 Farouqui Shahana Begum d/o Mumtaz Farouqui ... Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ..........

Mr M. D. Narwadkar, Advocate for the petitioner A. V. Deshmukh, AGP for respondent no. 1 and 2 Mr P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondents no. 3 .............

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2018.

ORDER:

.

None appears for respondent No. 4. Mr Narwadkar, learned counsel submits that, two more writ petitions are filed by the teachers of the same institution on the ground that they are not

2 Sr31 WP2779.2017 & Anr allowed to join the duties. As none appears for respondent no. 4, place these matters along with Writ Petitions No. 14436/2017 and 13698 of 2017 on 20.02.2018.

[ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE Punde